Flock cameras
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 22, 2026.
Public comments (4)
Praised the bridge process as a model of public input but said data center and surveillance approvals have raced ahead without adequate discussion.
City Council - Sep 22, 2026 · 2:33:29 →Raised a pattern of transparency failures: 40 million pounds of data center construction waste, two stalled city construction projects with the same contractor, and a Flock camera security lapse — asking the council to publish the oversight documents.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 1:51:31 →A hobbyist in IT said the city's own transparency looks OK but Flock itself withholds data; asked for public access to camera data records similar to DOT cameras.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 1:57:42 →Asked the council to revisit the 2024 Flock approval before the contract auto-renews in October, citing surveillance scope, data security and civil liberties.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 2:14:34 →